I'm talking about Russell Brand. How do you "report" on this story and not even know the basic premise? So, you claim the left are groomers, while knee-jerk defending a person accused of raping a 16 year old by force ?
You're very confused about the message and what rules for thee, not for me means. Rules for thee is when our overlords dictate what we are allowed to do or not do while simultaneously avoiding the same edicts (ie, work without taking an experimental injection, traveling where we want without being taxed, fined for enraging the climate change zealots, violating the law indiscriminately and paying no price (ahem Hunter) etc). In no way am I mandating you must do X or making it illegal to do Y when I suggest anything herein including that college is not the best value for the money spent anymore. I'm giving my perspective, that's it. If you or anyone else (myself included) has the means to send their kid to college and that's the best PERSONAL choice for them, then by all means send them. Fortunately, I have the means to do so without incurring $300K in student loans. For most however, that is no longer the case. But it's the individuals decision. It's really not that complicated.
So, you claim the left are groomers, while defending a person accused of raping a 16 year old by force ?
Not sure who you're talking about. Show me the court documents or police reports and I'll respond.
I'm talking about Russell Brand. How do you "report" on this story and not even know the basic premise? So, you claim the left are groomers, while knee-jerk defending a person accused of raping a 16 year old by force ?
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-66838794
More than familiar with the premise. Like I said, show me the police report or court documents. I'll wait.
"College is a scam! Don’t send your kids to college!"
Goes on $3000 college visit with his kid
Rules for thee, not me writ large.
You're very confused about the message and what rules for thee, not for me means. Rules for thee is when our overlords dictate what we are allowed to do or not do while simultaneously avoiding the same edicts (ie, work without taking an experimental injection, traveling where we want without being taxed, fined for enraging the climate change zealots, violating the law indiscriminately and paying no price (ahem Hunter) etc). In no way am I mandating you must do X or making it illegal to do Y when I suggest anything herein including that college is not the best value for the money spent anymore. I'm giving my perspective, that's it. If you or anyone else (myself included) has the means to send their kid to college and that's the best PERSONAL choice for them, then by all means send them. Fortunately, I have the means to do so without incurring $300K in student loans. For most however, that is no longer the case. But it's the individuals decision. It's really not that complicated.