Vegas, New Orleans and the End of the UK

Jan 05, 2025

With just 2.5 weeks left until inauguration, the nerves are starting to creep in. Maybe it’s just a random convergence of chaos, all popping off at once. After all, in a nation as sprawling and complicated as the United States, there’s always something going sideways. But it feels bigger than that—a sign of the times in a system that’s been gutted and defiled by the current crop of soulless, unhuman banditos running the show. Probabilistically speaking, chaos is always lurking, but this? This feels like black storm clouds are gathering as patriots try to run out the clock on President Cadaver’s administration.

Gut feel—I can’t shake that gnawing tension at the base of my skull, the one that whispers the forces of Extraction and Nihilism aren’t planning to go quietly. Maybe Trump’s decisive victory blindsided them, caught them flat-footed, and they’re scrambling to recalibrate. But now? Now it feels like the gears of fuckery are grinding at full tilt across the nation. And it’s not just the usual chaos from whoever’s yanking the strings of the brain-dead puppet currently masquerading as "in charge." This time, the sabotage is deliberate, blatant, and relentless—an open campaign to undermine the incoming Trump presidency and the future of the Republic. They’re not even bothering to hide it anymore. No pretense, no justifications—just raw, unapologetic sabotage, the same playbook they’ve been running for the last four years, only this time, they’ve ripped the mask off.

So here’s the laundry list of the asymmetric threats that seem to be popping up and popping off all in close proximity.

UFO Drones. This even allegedly ties back to the Las Vegas bombing as I’ll explain later.
Strange chemical smelling fog in certain parts of the US.
Asymmetric terror threats, both home grown and with more sure to come as a result of our reckless open border policies.
Enhanced chance of escalation of Ukraine-Russia-NATO
Avian Bird Flu Efforts (drawn right from the Covid playbook).

Just a short list as more is sure to come as we approach T-Day.

Hold the line and let’s jump into it.

The Tesla Blast Outside Trump International: Matthew Livelsberger’s Final Act or a Message from the Shadows?

The explosion of a Tesla Cybertruck outside Trump International Hotel in Las Vegas on New Year’s Day 2025 has all the makings of a story you’d expect in a post-modern dystopian thriller. A decorated Green Beret, Matthew Livelsberger, ends his life in an act that seems both deeply personal and disturbingly theatrical. And yet, the official narrative leaves far more questions than answers.

Here’s a slightly skeptical breakdown of this bizarre incident.

The Scene: A Cybertruck, an Explosion, and a Green Beret

In the early hours of January 1, Livelsberger drove a rented Tesla Cybertruck into the valet area of Trump International Hotel. Moments later, an explosion rattled the scene—caused by fireworks, gas canisters, and other homemade materials packed into the vehicle. Livelsberger was discovered dead from a self-inflicted gunshot wound. Seven bystanders suffered minor injuries, though Tesla’s much-hyped Cybertruck design contained the brunt of the blast.

Beneath the surface story lies a troubling, multi-layered narrative with far more questions than answers that demands scrutiny.

Livelsberger: Veteran, Martyr, or Man in Crisis?

Livelsberger’s background as a Green Beret lends immediate weight to this story. A man trained for precision and strategy, his choice of fireworks rather than high-grade explosives raises eyebrows. If he wanted mass casualties, he had the expertise to orchestrate it. Instead, what we see looks more like a personal statement—a cry of anguish rather than an act of terror.

According to notes recovered from his phone, Livelsberger referred to his actions as a “wake-up call” for America. He lamented weak leadership and a country losing its moral compass (no shit). He spoke of cleansing his mind from the burdens of war and the ghosts of fallen comrades. This reads less like terrorism and more like a veteran grappling with PTSD, feeling unheard and powerless.

But this is where the story begins to diverge.

A Narrative with Holes

GWOT veteran circles—and let’s be honest, a healthy dose of X conspiracy theorists—have pointed out the oddities. Everything from the bizarre choice of firearm to end his life (Desert Eagle?) to whispers of whistleblowing have emerged. Some claim Livelsberger might have been privy to damning information about U.S. military operations, perhaps even war crimes in Afghanistan. Could his actions have been a desperate bid to draw attention to something darker, something deliberately suppressed?

The choice of venue and vehicle is also curious. Why the Trump hotel? Why a Tesla Cybertruck? As a man who was supposedly a fan of both individuals, these are not random decisions. Were these just tools to maximize media coverage or is there an alternate explanation?

Then there’s the alleged manifesto (below). Its references to surveillance, drone warfare, and government cover-ups could easily be dismissed as the delusions of a man in mental distress—or they could be the breadcrumbs of a much larger story waiting to unfold.

The email seems to have ‘something for everyone’ in here and there are real questions whether Livelsberger wrote this or whether it was penned by someone else.

The drone story seems too farfetched to be true and there are questions about Livelsberger service record whether he would have even been in the proper locations or date necessary to witness the alleged Afghanistan war crimes.

Additionally, as this account notes, it’s unusual for an email to have the ‘spellcheck’ features in it unless this is being crafted as part of a text editor.

Also, why did Livelsberger safety number on Signal change AFTER his death. Was the dead body in the Tesla even him?

Here were other messages ‘found’ on Livelsberger’s phone according to LV Metro police.

One striking detail is how quickly and openly information has been released in this case. That level of transparency rarely happens unless someone wants it to happen. Contrast this with other instances where critical evidence is kept under lock and key for months or even years at a time—like the so-called "Trans Manifesto" from the Tennessee shooter, hidden for over a year, or the still-elusive Epstein client list, which seems destined to remain buried forever.

Take, for example, the New Orleans Islamic terror massacre, where a journalist was inexplicably allowed to stroll through the suspect’s home the very next day, casually filming what appeared to be a perfectly staged “terrorist launchpad.” This kind of access—especially so soon after such an event—is almost unheard of. It’s behavior that raises more questions than it answers, and it shouldn’t go unnoticed.

When information is controlled so tightly in other high-profile cases, the sudden openness here feels deliberate. The question isn’t just what we’re being shown but why.

Key Questions Demand Answers

Was Livelsberger truly acting alone? His military background makes it hard to dismiss the precision of his choices. If there were external pressures or unseen influences, they need to be exposed.
Why did he go to Las Vegas, New Mexico first before heading to Las Vegas Nevada.
Why fireworks? This seems intentionally non-lethal, almost as if the message—not the damage—was the primary goal.
What about the manifesto? If genuine, it could shine a light on systemic issues, from government overreach to the treatment of veterans. If fabricated, it raises questions about narrative manipulation and for what reasons.

A Skeptic’s Takeaway

From a skeptical perspective, this incident is a glaring reminder of two truths. First, the government continues to fail its veterans. Livelsberger’s mental state, his sense of isolation, and the apparent lack of support are tragic testaments to a system that talks big on patriotism but does little for those who served. Second, we must remain vigilant against narratives handed to us on a silver platter. Stories like this are often shaped by unseen hands, with layers of truth buried beneath official accounts.

This isn’t just about Livelsberger’s motives. It’s about the broader implications of what his act represents—a fracture in the fabric of American society, where those who give everything for their country often find themselves abandoned.

The investigation must dig deeper, beyond the surface details, to uncover the truth. Was Livelsberger a man in crisis, a whistleblower silenced, or both? Until we get those answers, we owe it to him—and to ourselves—not to settle for convenient explanations.

Perhaps the most interesting part of it all remains how far ahead of official investigators random citizen journalists and autists continue to be. This is true crowdsourcing of information and investigation.

For now, all we have are fragments of a story, wrapped in tragedy and unanswered questions. But make no mistake: stories like this often hold the key to larger truths about who we are as a nation.

r/ConservativeMemes - Leftist media pie chart

New Orleans Terror Attack

r/ConservativeMemes - Diversity Before Logic 🤭

On January 1, 2025, New Orleans witnessed a chilling act of terror that left Bourbon Street drenched in blood and the nation grappling with harsh realities. Shamsud-Din Jabbar, a Texas-born U.S. citizen and Army veteran, unleashed horror by driving a truck into a crowd, killing 14 and injuring dozens more. His truck bore an ISIS flag, and his vehicle and surrounding areas were laden with improvised explosive devices (IEDs). Despite these glaringly obvious signs of terrorism—including Jabbar's publicly declared allegiance to ISIS—the FBI hesitated to label it as such. This bureaucratic tap dance ignited a firestorm of public outrage, exposing cracks in the agency's priorities.

Let’s not mince words: Jabbar wasn’t some shadowy foreign operative. He was homegrown, radicalized on U.S. soil—a chilling testament to the danger lurking within our borders. A recent divorce and a plunge into radical Islamic ideology formed the backdrop of his descent, amplified by extremist propaganda that transformed him into a lone wolf predator. Yet, the larger tragedy lies not just in the attack itself but in the systemic failures that allowed such a threat to manifest unchecked.

The FBI’s response—or lack thereof—serves as a scathing indictment of the agency’s current state. While real threats like Jabbar simmer, resources are being poured into ideological witch hunts against concerned parents attending school board meetings, all under the guise of combating "white supremacy." This isn’t law enforcement; it’s lawfare. And while the FBI chases phantom menaces, real ones like Jabbar slip through the cracks, armed with explosive devices and twisted zealotry.

Critics point to the agency's obsession with Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives as a glaring misstep in its counterterrorism mission. When the FBI prioritizes woke checkboxes over hard-nosed counterterrorism, we end up with moments like this—moments where Bourbon Street becomes a battlefield.

This attack didn’t happen in a vacuum. Open border policies over the past four years have created a sieve, allowing potential threats to pour into the country unchecked. And while Jabbar was homegrown, how many more ticking time bombs have slipped in among the tens of thousands crossing our borders with unknown intentions? Just one day after the attack, supporters of Hamas took to the streets in New York City, openly marching for a cause steeped in violence and hatred. The question isn’t whether there are threats—it’s whether we’re willing to confront them.

The Bourbon Street attack is a wake-up call, a fiery flare against the dark sky of complacency. The FBI’s hesitation, its misaligned priorities, and its ideological distractions paint a grim picture of an agency in desperate need of recalibration. It’s time to refocus—away from politically driven narratives and back toward the singular mission that matters: protecting the American people from all enemies, foreign and domestic.

PS: The one part of this incident which I find the most baffling is how the very next day, a reporter was allowed to do a walk thru with cameras of din-Jabbar’s house which of course, was perfectly staged as a terrorist ‘starter home’.

This NEVER happens. And they didn’t seize the desktop/laptop or other evidence to see if he was working alone? Huge, flaming scarlet red flags.

r/ConservativeMemes - EV's Don't Kill People, Terrorist Do 🤔

Pakistani Muslim Rape Gangs in the UK

The Unbearable Truth: Groomer Gangs, a Nation’s Betrayal, and the Collapse of the UK

Some stories are so vile, so profoundly devastating, that to even speak of them feels like an injustice to their victims. This is one of those stories. But silence is complicity, and in the face of atrocities that demand action, silence is no longer an option.

Let’s begin with the unimaginable. Since 2000, somewhere between 250,000 and 1 million children—primarily young girls—have been brutally raped and exploited by so-called “groomer gangs” in the United Kingdom. These aren’t just isolated incidents or a series of tragic outliers. This is systemic, industrial-scale abuse. And for two decades, the truth has been suppressed.

The Truth That Refuses to Stay Buried

Thanks to platforms like X (formerly Twitter), the full scope of this horror has become impossible to ignore or whitewash. Journalists, whistleblowers, and victims have tried for years to sound the alarm, only to be silenced by a system more concerned with appearances than justice.

Why? Because addressing these crimes would have meant confronting uncomfortable truths about immigration, cultural incompatibility, and the failures of multiculturalism. Instead, those in power chose the path of least resistance—prioritizing the avoidance of accusations of "racism" or "Islamophobia" over the lives of their own children.

Let me make this clear: tolerance is not a virtue when it is extended to the intolerable. As Norm Macdonald once said, “It is absolutely intolerable what we’ve been forced to accept in the name of tolerance.”

His iconic tweet also captures the response we’ve seen where the original, much greater sin gets relegated to the back versus the fear of increased Islamophobia (which itself is a misnomer, as any phobia is an irrational, unwarranted fear of something whereas fear of Radical Islam is rational and the result of pattern recognition, not prejudice).

Meanwhile, the state propaganda and lies from journalists permitted these atrocities to go on for decades despite the reality.

Language Matters

The phrase “grooming gangs” is an insult to the victims and a testament to the cowardice of those who allowed this to continue. These are rape gangs. Child slavery rings. Barbaric acts committed by individuals who reject every value that Western civilization holds dear. Language shapes perception, and by softening the horror with euphemisms, we’ve paved the way for apathy and inaction.

The same principle applies to the broader cultural rot we see today. Calling pedophiles “minor-attracted persons” isn’t progressive—it’s obscene. It’s a linguistic smokescreen designed to normalize the unacceptable. When we lose clarity in language, we lose clarity in morality.

A Betrayal of the Social Compact

The role of government is simple: protect its citizens, uphold justice, and preserve the social order. The UK government has failed on all three counts. It has allowed its most vulnerable—its children—to be sacrificed at the altar of political correctness and multicultural appeasement.

This is not just a failure; it is a betrayal. Alongside COVID-era overreach, this stands as one of the most monstrous violations of the social compact in modern history. And let’s be clear: the architects and enablers of this betrayal deserve far more than polite accountability.

Firing the politicians and police chiefs who turned a blind eye isn’t justice. Public trials, harsh sentences, and retribution are the bare minimum. Wembley Stadium filled with the families of the victims delivering sentences of their own making? That would still fall short of the justice these crimes demand.

The Death Throes of a Nation

The United Kingdom, as it currently stands, is a dead nation walking. Its government is a headless chicken, stumbling and bleeding out, unaware that its collapse is inevitable. A society that cannot protect its children has no claim to survival.

Some might suggest the UK needs external intervention—a reverse King George scenario where the United States steps in, imposes order, and rebuilds Britain as a protectorate. After all, we did it with Japan after WWII, and it worked. But frankly, is the UK even worth saving in its current state?

The answer depends on whether the British people can rediscover their identity. Deport the criminals and their enablers. Reclaim the Western values that once made Britain great. Reinstate a moral order that prioritizes justice over appeasement. If they can’t—or won’t—then they’re on a path to societal oblivion, and the rest of us can only watch and learn.

Where is the Outrage?

Let’s unpack this horrifying logic: Women—and children—are being sacrificed on the altar of political correctness. The fear of being labeled "racist" has paralyzed a nation that once stood as the backbone of Western civilization. Britain, the same country that stood unflinchingly against Adolf Hitler, now turns a blind eye as the great-granddaughters of its World War II heroes are brutalized in their own towns. How did this happen? How did the descendants of men who fought to protect their homeland from unspeakable evil come to tolerate such atrocities, even within their own borders?

As my friend Jason Hochberg asked recently, “Where is the outrage?”

Where are the protests from the so-called champions of justice and equality? Where are the women’s rights organizations—the ones who claim to speak for victims everywhere? Let me spell it out:

Where is Gloria Steinem? Liz Warren? The National Organization for Women?
Why isn’t the UN condemning this on the global stage?
Why isn’t Bono holding a benefit concert, or Bruce Springsteen writing a ballad?
Where is Leonardo DiCaprio, who so passionately funds environmental causes, when it comes to funding relief for rape victims in the UK?
Why isn’t the NBA, so quick to protest in the name of social justice, organizing a march?

Nowhere. Silence. Not a word, not a gesture, not even a tweet. Remember when they told us "silence is violence"? Apparently, that only applies when it fits the narrative.

This isn’t activism; it’s selective outrage. Nearly the entire modern "activism" infrastructure exists for one purpose: to vilify conservative Western men. The irony? The policies these activists champion—unvetted immigration, unchecked political correctness—are creating the very conditions that allow real oppression and violence to thrive.

And what about the feminists who claim to fight against the patriarchy? Here's the cruelest irony of all: they’ve enabled the importation of millions of men from some of the most patriarchal cultures in the world, with no organized plan to assimilate them or challenge their deeply ingrained misogyny. The result? The very abuse they claim to oppose—rape, subjugation, and systemic dehumanization—flourishing in places like the UK.

Let’s be real: this isn’t just a policy failure; it’s a moral collapse. Thousands of women and children have been raped. Lives destroyed. Trauma inflicted that can never be undone. And yet, those who claim to care about justice, equality, and human rights remain silent because acknowledging this reality is inconvenient to their agenda.

Can this be turned around? Probably not. Not unless people find the courage to speak the truth, regardless of the consequences. And let’s be clear: there are consequences. In the UK, speaking out about these atrocities can mean job loss, social ostracism, or even imprisonment. True activism—the kind that demands courage—is in short supply. Too many, as we saw during COVID, fold the moment the stakes get real.

This is the bitter truth: the women’s movement has lost its soul. In their blind hatred of the Western patriarchy, they’ve ignored the actual threats posed by imported patriarchal systems. They’ve traded their moral clarity for political expedience. And now, the consequences are here, laid bare in the shattered lives of thousands of innocent women and children.

Pretending this isn’t happening will not stop it. Silence will not save them. Turning away will not protect anyone. So ask yourself: where do you stand? Because history will not look kindly on those who stood by and did nothing.

And finally, let me make the obvious point - this isn’t just a British crisis. It’s a Western crisis. The same ideological rot—placing tolerance above justice and diversity above safety—has infected nations across Europe and even the United States.

We must draw a line. Tolerance for the intolerable is not a virtue; it’s a betrayal of everything that makes civilization possible. Britain’s story is a cautionary tale, a stark reminder of what happens when a nation loses its moral compass.

For Britain, the choice is clear: rise to the challenge, restore justice, and reclaim your civilization—or fade into the shadows of history, another cautionary tale for those who come after. The world is watching. Let’s hope they choose wisely.

What I’m Watching and Reading…

Here’s the full Shawn Ryan podcast discussing the Las Vegas Truck bombing and the materials (manifesto, emails) that were sent to the guest on the show.